Executive summary
Create a Tourism Retained-Value Account and Standard.
Saint Lucia’s official table reports 1,047,293 visitor arrivals and EC$3.0676 billion in visitor expenditure for 2023. Those figures describe scale. They do not answer the more important development question: after offshore booking, imports and foreign factor income, how much of each visitor dollar becomes income or value added in Saint Lucia?
The measurement foundation also needs repair. An IMF technical-assistance mission found that total travel-export estimates could be overstated by as much as 14% in 2023 and recommended more representative in-person visitor surveys. Better policy therefore begins with better gross-spending measurement, then goes further to measure domestic retention.
SLPA’s transparent decision model—not an official statistic—estimates average net domestic retention around EC$0.55 per EC$1 of stayover spending, with higher illustrative retention for independent stayovers and yachting than for all-inclusive and cruise segments. The most defensible result is directional: tours, local transport, locally owned accommodation, local food and crafts tend to retain more than imported retail or spending captured offshore.
Developed from the research model “Domestic Value Added from Visitor Expenditure in Saint Lucia.” Official tourism and statistical-quality sources were independently cross-checked in July 2026.
Key findings
Gross visitor spending does not measure local income.
A visitor can pay for Saint Lucia while much of the transaction is booked abroad, used to buy imports or distributed to non-resident owners. Arrivals and spend should remain, but they cannot be the sole success measures.
Evidence-led findingBooking choices change where visitor money flows.
An independently booked visitor may purchase more tours, transport, food and services directly in the local economy. A tightly bundled product can deliver scale and employment while leaving fewer openings for local firms. Policy should measure both rather than assume either story.
Evidence-led findingReliable tourism policy starts with a better visitor survey.
If the visitor survey is biased, investment decisions, tax analysis and tourism strategy inherit the error. A redesigned survey should capture booking channel, package status, spending category, property ownership and where payment occurred.
Evidence-led findingTax incentives should buy measurable public value.
Tax concessions and development agreements should be linked to verified local procurement, worker progression, efficient water and energy use, community access and domestic ownership—not room count alone.
Evidence-led findingSLPA decision model
Estimated local value from each EC$1 of visitor spending.
EC$ retained per EC$1Illustrative model estimates, not official statistics. Exact segment values have low-to-medium confidence; use the ranking and ranges for policy exploration, not revenue scoring.
SLPA policy proposal
Tourism Retained-Value Account & Standard
Make the primary tourism question not only how many visitors came or what they spent, but how effectively Saint Lucia converted that activity into resident income, capable firms and resilient national assets.
A retained-value account
Publish gross spend, import content, resident compensation, local procurement, taxes and resident-owned operating surplus by segment and spending category.
Repair the visitor survey
Restore robust in-person sampling and capture package status, booking channel, property type, spending category, payment location and resident/non-resident ownership.
A local-linkage score
Score major tourism businesses on verified local purchasing, staff progression, local ownership, small-supplier access and water and energy performance.
Incentives for retained value
Tie new concessions and development-agreement benefits to public, time-bound retained-value commitments with clawbacks or step-downs where appropriate.
Make local experiences easier to find and book
Make local tours, transport, food, culture and crafts easier to discover, book and pay for before and during a visit.
Delivery sequence
Add retained value to the tourism data system
- Create a joint CSO–tourism–tax–customs technical group with a published retained-value measurement mandate.
- Redesign the visitor expenditure questionnaire and sampling plan in line with the IMF quality recommendations.
- Publish the methodology and uncertainty range behind any pilot retained-value estimate.
Publish the first national account and business scorecard
- Run the improved visitor survey across high and low seasons and reconcile it with external mirror data.
- Pilot the local-linkage score with a voluntary group of properties, tours and marine businesses.
- Create a verified directory and booking layer for local suppliers and independently purchased experiences.
Link tourism incentives to measured results
- Publish an annual retained-value account with segment ranges and revision notes.
- Write retained-value, staff-progression and resource-efficiency milestones into new tourism agreements.
- Use procurement and supplier data to target finance, standards support and aggregation for local firms.
Public accountability
Measures for public accountability
Recommended publication: quarterly operating signals and one independently reviewed annual outcome report.Captures the core conversion from gross activity to domestic benefit.
Shows where productive linkages are deepening—or absent.
Tests whether tourism creates careers as well as jobs.
Prevents false precision from becoming policy fact.
Limits, uncertainty & sources
Limits of this analysis
- The segment retention values are SLPA model estimates built from incomplete public data and explicit assumptions. They are not Tourism Satellite Account results or official national statistics.
- The IMF’s 14% figure is an upper-bound result from a mirror-data exercise focused on 2023 measurement discrepancy, not a blanket correction factor for every year or tourism segment.
- Higher estimated retention does not automatically mean a segment should displace another. Scale, seasonality, employment quality, environmental cost and fiscal contribution must be considered together.
Primary and institutional sources
01